THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT (CHAPTER IV)
📄 THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872: PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT (CHAPTER IV)
I. OBLIGATION & TENDER OF PERFORMANCE
| Sec. | Topic | Objective Principle (Ratio) | Case Law / Note |
| 37 | Obligation to Perform | Parties must perform or offer to perform their promises unless dispensed with or excused by law. | The death of the promisor discharges contracts involving personal skill (Sec. 40). |
| 38 | Offer of Performance (Tender) | The promisor is discharged if their offer is rejected. Tender must be unconditional, made at the proper time and place, and must allow the promisee a reasonable opportunity to examine the goods/services. | Attempted Performance is legally equivalent to actual performance for discharging the promisor. |
| 39 | Refusal to Perform Wholly | If a party wholly refuses to perform or disables themselves, the promisee may rescind the contract. | This is the principle of Anticipatory Breach, allowing the promisee to sue immediately. |
II. PERFORMANCE BY WHOM & JOINT PROMISES
| Sec. | Topic | Objective Principle (Ratio) | Case Law / Note |
| 40 | Who Must Perform | Must be performed by the promisor only if it involves personal skill. Otherwise, by the agent or legal representative. | Personal contracts are discharged upon the death of the promisor. |
| 41 | Acceptance from Third Person | Acceptance of performance from a third party discharges the original promisor from their liability. | An exception to the general rule of liability. |
| 43 | Compelling Performance | The promisee can compel any one or more of the joint promisors to perform the whole promise. | The performing joint promisor can then claim contribution from the others. |
III. TIME, RECIPROCAL PROMISES & DISCHARGE BY OPERATION
| Sec. | Topic | Objective Principle (Ratio) | Case Law / Note |
| 51 | Simultaneous Performance | In reciprocal promises, the promisor need not perform unless the promisee is ready and willing to perform. | Essential for concurrent obligations. |
| 55 | Time as Essence | If time is essential, delay makes the contract voidable. If time is non-essential, the promisee can claim compensation but cannot repudiate the contract. | Note: In contracts for immovable property, time is generally not the essence. |
| 56 | Doctrine of Frustration | A contract becomes void if the performance becomes impossible or unlawful after the contract is made (Supervening Impossibility). | Case Law: Satyabrata Ghose v. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. (Frustration applies to destruction of the fundamental basis). |
| 62 | Novation/Rescission/Alteration | Substitution of a new contract (Novation), cancellation (Rescission), or change in terms (Alteration) discharges the original contract. | Novation requires the consent of all parties, including the new party. |
| 63 | Remission/Waiver | The promisee can accept a lesser sum or dispense with performance without new consideration. | This is an exception to the rule of consideration. |
| 65 | Restitution | Upon a contract becoming void (e.g., under Sec. 56), the person who received an advantage must restore it or make compensation. | Based on the Principle of Unjust Enrichment. |
| 60 | Appropriation of Payments | Clayton's Rule: Where neither party specifies, the payment is applied in the order of time to the debts that are first in time (oldest debt discharged first). | This is the implied rule for running accounts. |
Comments
Post a Comment